The Dark Knight

http://www.entertainmentwallpaper.com/images/desktops/movie/the_dark_knight06.jpg

“Let’s wind the clocks back a year,” the Joker says to a gang of miscreants in need of some anarchic guidance in The Dark Knight. You follow his instruction: Back in the summer of 2007, fanboys had begun to be placated about the counter-typecasting of Heath Ledger as Batman’s clown-faced villain, as images leaked of a pretty boy turned creepshow, his hair greasy and matted, his face scarred and messily L’Oreal’d like an Extreme Makeover contestant who got caught in a hurricane.

Word of Ledger’s phenomenal performance followed—then, in January, his sudden death.

Since then, there’s been posthumous Oscar talk. Best Picture chatter, too. Consider all this, and set the clock back to now. Whether the film is any good has almost stopped being an issue. The real question is: Can The Dark Knight possibly live up to all its hype?

Of course not—but it does come close. Christopher Nolan’s sequel to his darkly psychological, nearly Ang Lee-ian rebooting of the Caped Crusader franchise, 2005’s Batman Begins, is as rich and epic as his origin story (152 minutes to the predecessor’s 140), satisfying as a well-crafted crime drama but notable for lacking any traces of camp.

Though, in the new installment, the vigilante shares the screen with two iconic villains, the Joker and Two-Face, it’s unlikely that more outlandish series characters such as the Penguin or Mr. Freeze will ever walk Nolan’s universe. Like Iron Man, this Batman (Christian Bale) is a superhero of the real world. His “powers” come courtesy of technology, not freak accidents. He works with local law enforcement, such as Gotham City police Lt. James Gordon (Gary Oldman) and, under his billionaire do-gooder guise of Bruce Wayne, District Attorney Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart). And Martin Scorsese, take note: In The Dark Knight, Batman battles, of all rivals, the mafia.

There’s less fun in Nolan’s interpretation, but the saga is just as exhilarating. Ledger’s Joker supplies the only traces of humor in a script (co-written by the director and his brother, Jonathan) whose plot is complex but fundamentally deals with the evergreen topic of good versus evil and the angst that ensues when the lines between the two blur. The Joker is introduced in the opening sequence, supervising a daytime bank robbery and ingeniously killing off each of his clown-masked accomplices as soon as they’ve completed their integral tasks.

He doesn’t really care about the money, though, which actually belongs to the mob. The Joker just wants to introduce a little chaos to Gotham City, and he uses the cash to leverage the aid of organized crime in ridding the world of “the Batman” and, worse, public sweetheart and all-around good guy Dent.

Speaking of sweethearts, Batman’s former squeeze, Rachel Dawes (Maggie Gyllenhaal, mercifully taking over for Batman Begins’ Katie Holmes), is now with Dent but has promised Bruce that they will be together again once his dress-up days are behind him.

Now, Ledger. Yes, his performance is every bit as inventive, freaky, and career-making as rumors and trailers have led you to believe. His Joker’s voice is slightly fey, his speech often deliberate, like someone—appropriately—who mentally isn’t all there. He smacks his lips—his smile extended by knife scars—and darts his tongue.

This Joker’s origin is unclear—he tells different stories about who cut his face and why. (The first version, which lends the film its “Why So Serious?” tagline, is absolutely chilling, thanks in no small part to Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard’s spot-on score.)

Ledger’s odd mannerisms are small, however, putting miles between his and Jack Nicholson’s take on the character in 1989’s Batman and moving into Anton Chigurh territory: As with the No Country for Old Men villain, you’ll get tense when the Joker’s onscreen, ready for some horrific act to follow.

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d8/sic_kid/TheDarkKnightTheJoker13.jpg

But the most complimentary thing that can be said about Ledger’s performance is that, except for that turn-back-the-clock line, you don’t spend the movie thinking about his passing—and that’s because Ledger isn’t there. It’s only the Joker you see.

In comparison, Bale is positively wooden—that phlegmy Batvoice has got to go—and the best part about Eckhart’s contribution is the ghoulish special effects once Dent finally becomes Two-Face, which happens way too late and way too easily. (Poor editing also truncates crucial sequences such as the well-publicized party scene.)

The action, however, is thrilling: From gigantic explosions to an airborne rig to a nearly silent shot of Batman gliding from a rooftop on a dark Hong Kong night, Nolan crafts images that are both heart-stopping and beautiful. The new Batsuit, -mobile, and -pod? All barely noticeable—or notable—when there are fireballs to behold.

Overshadowed by the Ledger buzz is The Dark Knight’s technological milestone: Nolan filmed approximately 30 minutes, mostly action sequences, with IMAX cameras, marking the first time such a technique has been used in a feature film. The result—shots that are expansive, deep, and immersive—may not be immediately obvious to anyone not looking for the cinematographical switches.

But walking out to a parking garage or your own city’s streets afterward, you’ll likely have a “Hey, this isn’t Gotham!” moment. It’s a level of transportation that no cackling, Kool Aid-colored villain could achieve, but it’s what every comic book fan truly wants.

Mamma Mia!

http://www.canmag.com/images/front/movies20082/mammamiap2.jpg

When he’s singing, S.O.S.

If you prefer your filmic escapes flooded with sunshine and happiness, Mamma Mia! froths over with both. This faithful big-screen adaptation of the stage musical—directed by the original Broadway show’s Phyllida Lloyd—is a suitable alternative for those who not only prefer their ABBA affordable but also accompanied by movie stars and on-location scenery instead of theater no-names and worn touring set pieces. Of course, you could also listen to a greatest-hits CD with nearly the same result.

Mamma Mia! is little more than a string of ABBA tunes with a story wedged in about a 20-year-old bride, Sophie (Amanda Seyfried), who’s about to be married at the Greek inn owned by her mother, Donna (Meryl Streep). Sophie doesn’t know who her dad is, but when she reads Donna’s journal and discovers that the former disco queen had three dalliances the year she was born, she invites all three men to the ceremony: Bill (Stellan Skarsgård), an adventurer; Harry (Colin Firth), a cautious accountant; and Sam (Pierce Brosnan), Donna’s true love who got away.

Also on the guest list are Donna’s former girl-group-mates, cougar poster-woman Tanya (Christine Baranski) and “lone wolf” Rosie (Julie Walters), as well as Sophie’s friends and an island’s worth of employees, the better to populate impromptu dance parties.

The gorgeous Greek scenery, with sun flooding even indoor shots and water too blue to wrap your mind around, is by far the best part of the film. Runners-up include Streep, who largely needed only to show up to nail her part as the flaky-but-loving bohemian mom but will also silence popcorn munchers with her improbably emotive, rafters-hitting version of “The Winner Takes It All,” and Seyfried, whose strong voice, wide-eyed prettiness, and sweet charm make her a presence as lovely as the location. Skarsgård is rather likable in this atypical role as well.

The movie goes downhill from there, particularly bottoming out whenever Brosnan tries to sing (it’s beyond awful) or the script goes sitcom (Walters’ Rosie is particularly grating as squat, nerdly comic relief). It’s likely, though, that Mamma Mia!’s intended audience will be too buoyed by its relentless feel-goodness to notice such quibbles, while, to musical- and ABBA-haters, the film will act like garlic to vampires no matter how numerous its pluses.

The Last Mistress

http://content8.flixster.com/photo/11/08/47/11084762_ori.jpg

“And when she was bad, she was…”: Asia.

A 19th-century bodice-ripper starring Asia Argento as a lady of a certain reputation sounds destined for a two-word summary: pretty trash. And for the most part, that’s all The Last Mistress is—but damned if it doesn’t suck you in like a late-night rerun of Rock of Love.

Catherine Breillat, a French director with a history of exploring sexuality and gender politics in films such as Fat Girl and Romance, plays with the idea of destructive but irresistible love in her adaptation of Jules Barbey d’Aurevilly’s novel. Argento is Vellini, the titular half of the story’s liaison dangereuse who’s grown used to the 10-year open relationship she’s had with Ryno de Marigny (Fu’ad Aït Aattou), a penniless “unbridled libertine” with pillowy Abercrombie & Fitch looks. But Ryno has decided to trade in his whore for a proper madonna and tells Vellini that he’ll no longer be visiting after he marries Hermangarde (Roxane Mesquida), high-society granddaughter of the Marquise de Flers (Claude Sarraute).

None of it is terribly interesting at first; the marriage is gossiped about by irritating old clucks the Comtesse d’Artelles (Yolande Moreau) and the Vicomte de Prony (Michael Lonsdale), the latter having enjoyed an occasional dalliance with Vellini. And Argento’s casting as an edgy slut—she kisses a girl! she licks blood off her lover’s chest!—seems like just another tired opportunity for her to stretch her body instead of whatever acting chops she may indeed possess.

When the Marquise de Flers hears exactly how long Ryno’s affair has been going on and demands that he tell her all the sordid details of their history, however, it’s a move that saves the film: Ryno’s abrupt attraction to the woman he first deemed an “ugly mutt” may be eye-rolling—he loves how she hates him—but soon their relationship is portrayed as a genuine, complicated love story, with Argento even coming across as sympathetically vulnerable in a scene or two.

Ryno’s confession also includes lots of explicit sex, which not only doesn’t hurt the film’s watchability but also makes the Marquise look like the coolest grandma alive. “Go on,” she tells Ryno in the film’s funniest scene, drinking port and practically falling off the chair in which she’s comfortably slumped. “I’m enthralled!” You will be, too.

Tropic Thunder

http://images.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2008/08/13/tropic_thunder/story.jpg

Jungle fever

Tropic Thunder may have first appeared on your radar last August, when Owen Wilson dropped out of filming after his suicide attempt. Or maybe you heard about it earlier this year, when word got out that Robert Downey Jr., in the film’s movie-within-a-movie, would be playing a black character.

But the premise for this Hollywood-skewering war spoof has reportedly been roller-derbying around writer-director Ben Stiller’s brain since 1987. That’s 21 years spent marinating in the comedian’s twisted psyche, eventually co-molded by scripters Justin Theroux and Etan Cohen and, certainly, further shaped by an A-list cast that includes Jack Black, Nick Nolte, Steve Coogan, and Danny McBride.

The result? A comedy beast that’s nearly impossible to dissect. At least not without giving up the goods, anyway. Whereas the details about Downey’s racial transformation, for example – his character, Kirk Lazarus, is actually an Australian actor so celebrated and Method he’s hired to portray an African-American soldier in a Vietnam flick – might have comprised 75 percent of the gag in lesser hands, here the concept is a mere launching point for a performance so brilliant, it’s fair to regard Lazaurs as August’s Joker. Another not-so-secret cameo may help rinse the ick off a superstar’s recently tarred reputation. (Though, in my opinion, not quite.)

There are fake trailers, surprise violence, layers upon layers of film-industry mockery, and rampant offensiveness that’s attracted cries for boycotts from more than one activist group. You can hear Stiller’s diligence to his vision in the dialogue: “More stupid!” demands a villain who takes the director’s character, Tugg Speedman, hostage and orders him to re-create one of his broad critical flops. He complies, delivering this nugget as a mentally challenged man talking about bad dreams: “This head movie makes mah eyes rain!” Earlier, Lazarus discusses craft with Speedman, declaring that his commitment to the aforementioned part must have left him feeling “moronical.”

The thing about moronicality is that it takes loads of intelligence to get it right, and in this regard Tropic Thunder can sidle up to classics from Some Like It Hot to The Jerk. For all its comedic density, the plot is simple: A memoir by Four Leaf Tayback (Nolte), Vietnam’s Pvt. Ryan, is being adapted to the big screen by clueless British director Damien Cockburn (Coogan). He can’t control his cast, which besides Lazarus and action-hero Speedman includes rapper-turned-actor Alpa Chino (Brandon T. Jackson), drug-addled star of Eddie Murphy-esque franchise The Fatties, Jeff Portnoy (Black), and still-level-headed newcomer, Kevin Sandusky (Jay Baruchel).

Tayback suggests that Cockburn “take them off the grid” to scare the artistes out of his actors and elicit more believable performances. But Cockburn’s orchestrated dumping of his cast into the jungle for a guerrilla shoot goes immediately wrong, and soon well-armored poppy farmers assume the actors are DEA agents. The thespians’ survival skills kick in – eventually – as they try to fight their way back to the world of gift bags and Booty Sweat (Chino’s energy drink).

Unlike last week’s Pineapple Express, Tropic Thunder’s blood-and-guts angle is introduced early and graphically, so its combination of action and yucks never feels disingenuous. All of the big players have ace moments – even Matthew McConaughey,who took over Wilson’s part as Speedman’s agent – but Stiller and Downey steal it: Stiller’s Speedman is a superior Derek Zoolander, hilarious whether he’s wriggling his body while dramatically taking bullets or quietly going nuts in captivity.

And it’s all of 30 seconds before Downey kills, in this case in his character’s trailer, without even uttering a word: Dressed as a monk – and still white – his expression during the preview’s narration is a dead-on imitation of every pretentious performance ever captured onscreen. As far as his guttural delivery and mannerisms when “black,” it’s too thorough, ridiculous, and well-plotted to be offensive (and Chino calls Lazarus on it repeatedly for good measure).

Speedman’s “Simple Jim” character – with buck teeth and a peroxide Prince Valiant cut — isn’t as excusable. But the script’s ingenious argument of the drawbacks of an actor “going full retard” — as well as the movie overall – will make your eyes rain.

Please Stand By…

New content on this new site to come shortly. Right now I’m working on smoothing out all the weirdness from transferring two blogs’ worth of content — including Movie Babe, which will be down soon — and deciding on a design that doesn’t look like a 10-year-old’s in charge.

In the meantime, you can find my reviews at Washington City Paper.

HOLY FLURKIN’ SNIT, BATMAN!

Weekend of July 20, 2008

Box Office

1 new Dark Knight 1 $155.3M $155.3M $35.6k 4366 94%
2 new Mamma Mia! 1 $27.6M $27.6M $9.3k 2976 54%
3 2 Hancock 3 $14M $191.5M $3.7k 3776 38%
4 3 Journey to the Center of the Earth 2 $11.9M $43.1M $4.2k 2830 60%
5 1 Hellboy II: The Golden Army 2 $10M $56.4M $3.2k 3125 88%
6 4 WALL-E 4 $9.8M $182.5M $3k 3310 96%
7 new Space Chimps 1 $7.4M $7.4M $2.9k 2511 39%
8 5 Wanted 4 $5.1M $123.3M $2.1k 2433 73%
9 6 Get Smart 5 $4.1M $119.6M $1.9k 2135 53%
10 8 Kung Fu Panda 7 $1.8M $206.5M $1.2k 1505 88%
11 7 Meet Dave 2 $1.6M $9.4M $0.5k 3011 20%
12 11 Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull 9 $1M $312.6M $1.3k 757 76%

Weekend of July 13, 2008

Box Office

1 new Hellboy II: The Golden Army 1 $35.9M $35.9M $11.2k 3204 88%
2 1 Hancock 2 $33M $165M $8.3k 3965 37%
3 new Journey to the Center of the Earth 1 $20.6M $20.6M $7.3k 2811 61%
4 2 WALL-E 3 $18.5M $162.8M $4.8k 3849 97%
5 3 Wanted 3 $11.6M $112M $3.7k 3157 72%
6 4 Get Smart 4 $7.1M $111.5M $2.3k 3086 52%
7 new Meet Dave 1 $5.3M $5.3M $1.8k 3011 22%
8 5 Kung Fu Panda 6 $4.3M $202M $1.6k 2704 88%
9 8 Kit Kittredge: An American Girl 4 $2.4M $11M $1.3k 1849 81%
10 7 Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull 8 $2.3M $310.5M $1.4k 1664 76%
11 6 Incredible Hulk 5 $2.2M $129.8M $1.1k 1951 68%
12 9 Sex and the City: The Movie 7 $1.7M $148.2M $1.7k 1025 51%

Source: Rotten Tomatoes

The Wackness

 //www.collider.com/uploads/imageGallery/Wackness_The/the_wackness_movie_image_josh_peck__1_.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

Video fantasies — the first symptom of reefer madness

The doctor-patient relationship in The Wackness seems typical at first. It’s 1994 in New York, and a high school senior is enduring another fruitless session with his psychiatrist. The doctor says that he sees “no joy” when he looks at Luke. Luke detects misery wafting from Dr. Squires, too, which only validates the teen’s suspicion that the path to adulthood does not lead to happiness. “Tomorrow, I graduate,” Luke muses in a voice-over. “And then I go to my safety school. And then I get older. And then I die.” To both of them, there is no grass-is-always-greener scenario.

Unless that grass is packed in a bong. When Squires (Ben Kingsley) presses Luke (Josh Peck) to open up, and the kid finally blurts, “Dr. Squires, how much do you need?” he’s not talking about feelings. He’s talking about weed. Whether their sessions were cooked up to disguise Luke’s visits or the drugs serve as payment for sought-out therapy isn’t clear, but the arrangement blossoms into an odd friendship between two lonely dudes.

Luke, floppy-banged and warm-eyed, deals dope in his Upper East Side neighborhood, drowns out his parents’ arguments with hip-hop, and interacts with other students only when they’re looking for the smokable kind of best bud. Squires, meanwhile, is a tastefully long-haired and goateed former hippie who doesn’t really see himself as a grown-up and is stunned to find himself in a cold marriage, numbing his melancholy with alcohol and the very prescriptions he refuses to give Luke, instead advising him to “embrace his pain.” Sex would help Luke, too, just as long as it’s not with Squires’ stepdaughter, Stephanie (Olivia Thirlby). “Getting laid is getting fixed, you know?” Squires advises. “Except for dogs.”

Writer-director Jonathan Levine’s film is a nostalgia piece about a recent but also rather different time, when old-schoolers like Luke refused to switch from cassettes to CDs and Giuliani was just beginning to clean up New York. (The former mayor is the movie’s main punching bag.) Grafittied placards mark the story’s progression throughout the summer, and hip-hop beats are constant, with artists such as the Notorious B.I.G., Nas, Raekwon, and A Tribe Called Quest filling the soundtrack. The tone is humid: It’s dark inside Squires’ wood-paneled office, but like most New Yorkers, Luke doesn’t spend a lot of time indoors. Instead, he’s sweatin’ his troubles outside, languidly pushing the Italian-ice cart that serves as his pot-delivery system through crowded streets and parks, his headphones providing the real chill.

Aside from the music and not-altogether-dated dialogue (“You’re mad outta my league,” Luke tells Stephanie), The Wackness is a classic story about first love and, more significantly, the struggles of the walking wounded who aren’t quite clinically depressed but can’t always get out of bed, either. Luke and Stephanie’s relationship is natural and engaging—Peck, from Nickelodeon’s Drake & Josh, and Thirlby, best known from Juno—are likably low-key and funny without seeming scripted. But the deeper and more interesting arc involves Squires. Kingsley, even with a dubious New York accent, makes Squires entertaining and tragic, out of touch with the demographic he believes he never left and the scene he imagines still exists.

In one of the film’s best scenes, he takes Luke to one of his old hangouts, which is now not quite so happening. “The city isn’t the same,” Squires laments. “The drugs, the girls, the music—the fucking muuuusic,” he says, drawing out the last word with closed eyes and a heavy heart, and you feel his yearning. He finds a temporary distraction when some of Luke’s acquaintances show up, including a hippie princess played by Mary-Kate Olsen, who proceeds to crawl onto his lap. When the group finally gets thrown out, Squires yells, “They’re all 18!” Luke enlightens him that the drinking age has been 21 “since forever.” “Fucking Giuliani,” the doctor responds.

As both of them try to figure out what’s missing in their lives, the film gets a bit sitcom-like, but there’s enough weight to make gimmicks such as Squires helping Luke sell his wares forgivable. It doesn’t matter if you were a teenager in 1994, a flower child in the ’60s, or even a stoner in the here and now: The Wackness may touch on a few specific themes, but ultimately it explores the more universal question of how to deal.

The Stone Angel

http://www.dgcodc.ca/graphics/StoneAngel.jpeg

The Globe and Mail needs to run a correction

Life’s trials make for melodrama instead of melancholy in The Stone Angel, writer-director Kari Skogland’s adaptation of Margaret Laurence’s novel. It’s with a heavy hand that Skogland tells the already piled-on, time-jumping story of Hagar, a demented elderly woman who recalls her fiery younger days when her son threatens to put her in a home. Overacted, underwritten, and with flashback cues so lazy the characters may as well just say, “I remember when…,” the film feels like The Notebook II—which almost guarantees it will find an audience easily enraptured by weepies.

The elder Hagar is played by Ellen Burstyn, who can usually make any movie tolerable but is given little to work with here. Her character is, to be blunt, a jerk, her purported “strong will” communicated solely via constant antagonism and snotty remarks toward her son Marvin (Dylan Baker) and his wife, Doris (Sheila McCarthy). When they admit they can’t take care of her anymore, Hagar runs away to the long-abandoned farmhouse where she raised her family, at which point the film largely remains in the past.

Hagar Currie (played in her youth by Christine Horne, whose acting chops and remarkable resemblance to Burstyn make her the best part of the movie) was born the daughter of a wealthy and proud Scotsman and a mother who died giving birth to her younger brother. Dad all but ignored his son while doting on Hagar, insistent that she marry someone of her class. Instead, she chose Bram (Cole Hauser), a commoner who associated with “half-breeds,” which prompted her father to disown her and leave her none of his inheritance.

Hagar does her best to teach Bram and her two sons manners and look the other way regarding her husband’s drinking and the home they can’t afford to decorate. But she eventually realizes that passion can’t sustain a marriage and also takes after Dad in a more damaging manner, favoring younger son John (Noah Meade) over Marvin, whispering to John that he’s a “true Currie.”

Soon, Hagar’s life unravels spectacularly, and the setbacks and tragedies don’t stop until The Stone Angel’s very last frame. Death and disease chip away at both Hagar’s resolve and the audience’s patience, with the plot becoming more of a highlight reel of suffering instead of an interesting story of a deeply lived life. It’s not long before you become immune to it all, which erases any sympathy you might have started to feel for Burstyn’s Hagar the Horrible and makes the final, purple-choked chapters even more exasperating than those that came before.

Encounters at the End of the World

http://www.collider.com/uploads/imageGallery/Encounters_at_the_End_of_World/encounters_at_the_end_of_the_world_movie_image_werner_herzog__2_.jpg

Lovelier than that loathesome old sun.

In Encounters at the End of the World, Werner Herzog discovers in Antarctica that it’s rather likely human beings will soon go the way of the dinosaur.

What’s distressing is that the director doesn’t seem to mind.

Extinction, after all, would rid this overly technological, painfully nondeliberate world of “abominations” such as yoga classes and “fluffy penguin” movies—another of which Herzog assured his benefactors, the National Science Foundation, he would not be making.

Despite a couple of wisecracks at penguins’ expense, Herzog, who also narrates, sounds almost wistful at the beginning of his ghostly and gorgeous (if meandering) film, wondering what kind of people he’d meet at the world’s southernmost point: “What were their dreams?” he asks.

But Werner the Curious soon morphs into Werner the Crank, with impatient, sometimes laughably teen-goth narration that, depending on your mood, is either entertaining or insufferable. “I loathe the sun, both on my celluloid and my skin,” Herzog drones, pleased when the “postcard-pretty weather” during the region’s perpetual-daylight season turns foul. He’s eager to leave McMurdo Station, a research center with climate-controlled housing and a horrid exercise facility, as soon as he arrives, regarding it as an ugly, too-civilized Antarctica Lite.

Herzog does interview several residents there, though, identifying them with career hyphenations such as “Philosopher-Forklift Driver,” and seems nonjudgmental as he learns what led them to choose life on frozen tundra. Later, however, he’s not so nice, allowing a couple of eccentrics to blather for just a bit before interrupting with overdubs that essentially say, “To make a long, dull story short…”

Scientists, from seal studiers to subatomic-particle chasers to, yes, penguin experts, receive more deferential treatment, with Herzog not only inquiring about their projects but also lobbing hardballs about intelligence and creation.

The film is most absorbing, though, when Herzog stays out of the way: Aside from otherworldly, astonishing views of the continent both aboveground and deep beneath the ice, there’s the eerie audio of seal calls that sound, according to one researcher, “like Pink Floyd or something,” another scientist’s description of sea creatures that are more horrific than anything dreamed up in a sci-fi novel, and randomly caught, fraught footage of a penguin who keeps still as his peers go off to the left or the right, then resolutely toddles straight ahead on his own.

Herzog barely registers any emotion when he notes the little guy is headed for certain death, but the sadness and mystery of the image is unmistakable.